Planning and Development Research

 Here’s a step-by-step approach to planning an effective survey or evaluation, especially in complex or remote project settings: 1. Define Objectives and Scope Clarify Objectives : Identify the key goals of the survey or evaluation. Are you assessing project outcomes, impact, or baseline conditions? Set Scope : Determine the target population, geographic area, and specific issues you aim to study. Identify Indicators : Choose relevant indicators to measure success (e.g., health outcomes, livelihood improvements, etc.) based on project goals. 2. Develop Research Questions and Hypotheses Formulate Questions : Create clear and measurable questions that will directly address the objectives. Develop Hypotheses : For impact evaluations, develop hypotheses that describe expected changes or relationships between project activities and outcomes. 3. Select Methodology Choose a Design : Decide between quantitative (e.g., structured surveys), qualitative (e.g., interviews, focus groups), or mixed-

  Key M&E Tools Logical Framework (LogFrame): A structured tool used to plan, monitor, and evaluate projects by mapping objectives, inputs, outputs, outcomes, and indicators. It clarifies project logic and ensures alignment across goals and activities. Theory of Change (ToC): A visual and narrative model illustrating how a project’s activities lead to short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes. ToC helps map out the pathways to change and assumptions, allowing for a clear understanding of impact. Results-Based Management (RBM): An approach focused on achieving results, using indicators and performance metrics to track progress, manage for results, and guide decision-making. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Specific, measurable indicators set up to monitor the progress and success of project activities against goals. Monitoring and Evaluation Plan: A comprehensive document detailing the indicators, data sources, methods, and timelines to systematically track project progress and

Instructions: (Please read carefully)   This document has two (2) pages, containing three questions. All questions should be answered. This is a test of your thought processes, writing skills and experiences. Your answers will therefore be judged on the content as well as on your clarity of reasoning and writing.  Please respond to the questions using your own original thoughts and words in English. Inclusion of any text, diagrams or information from other people or sources (including publications, websites etc.) will result is disqualification from the selection process.  Candidates are advised not to indulge in plagiarism and not to use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools. If detected, it will result in summary disqualification of the candidate from the process.  The weight of each question and segments of the question and word limits are specified.  Please include your answers directly in this MS Word document.   Do not include your name anywhere in the document.  Responses should be

  1. Project Knowledge and UNDP Framework Q: How do you think gender and diversity considerations should be integrated into the ERRD-CHT Project? A: Gender and diversity are essential to achieving sustainable outcomes in development projects. For the ERRD-CHT Project, I would ensure that all planning, monitoring, and evaluation stages incorporate gender and diversity indicators. This would involve identifying the unique needs and challenges faced by women, indigenous groups, and marginalized communities in CHT. Additionally, I would aim to disaggregate data by gender and ethnicity to highlight different impacts and support targeted interventions. Q: What strategies would you use to ensure the project’s impact is inclusive of women, marginalized communities, and ethnic minorities in CHT? A: I would work with local stakeholders and representatives from different community groups to develop culturally appropriate strategies that encourage active participation. This may involve setting